Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
To introduce students to the specific areas of psychology of religion with an emphasis on critical thinking about the relation between psychology and religion (religiosity, spirituality)
Complex relations among different experiences, cognition, motivation, emotion and behavior within religion, spirituality
Upon completion of the course, students will be able to:
Explain the complexity of relationships between psychology (schools of psychology, theories and practices) and religiosity/spirituality in the context of person, nurture, education, research and counselling
Evaluation of research in the field of psychology of religion and spirituality
Analysis of the relation between psychological dimensions (cognition, motivation, personality) and religion/spirituality
Explain healthy and mature elements of religion and spirituality in the context of wellbeing, mental health and counseling
Analysis and reflecting personal experiences of silence, contemplation and practical sessions (workshops) as important aspects of religiosity and spirituality for personal growth and mental health
Religion in psychological perspective. Dimensions of religion/spirituality. Psychological correlates of beliefs. Praying (types, influences).
Psychological theories on religion and spirituality. Religion orientation and motivation.
Conceptualization and measurement of religion and spirituality.
Religion in the person. Psychology of personality and religious behavior.
Religion phenomenon and neuroscience.
Developmental psychology in the context of religion.
Religion and health, psychological well-being. Psychological coping with stressful events. The role of religion behaviour in the context of counselling.
Mystical experiences.
Psychological dimensions of sins and sacrifice. Psychological dimensions of repentance, forgiveness and confession.
Healthy and unhealthy religiosity. Maturity and immaturity mechanisms.
Religion, conversion and spirituality transformation.
What is the relation of psychology to religion? (Jonte-Pace & Parsons, 2002)
Division 36 of the APA officially became the Association for the Psychology of Religion and Spirituality (2010)
Does psychology attack, critique, and challenge religion?
Subject matter of religion (religiosity and spirituality) and psychology?
Psychological models or implicit visions of person, personality, and personhood that interfere with ability to study religion?
Psychology and religion, Psychology of religion, Religion and psychology?
“and,” “of,” “in dialogue with” (Wulff, 2000)
empirical study of religion emerged in the middle of the 20. century
Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion
Journal of Religion and Health
Review of Religious Research
Journal of Psychology and Theology
Journal of Psychology and Christianity
Psychology of Religion and Spirituality (APA)
APA began when the Catholic Psychological Association began meeting as an interest group at the 1946 annual meeting of the APA
Psychologists Interested in Religious Issues (PIRI), a title formally adopted in 1970 with the intent of obtaining divisional status in the APA
In 1992, the division’s name was changed to Psychology of Religion.
The most recent change occurred in 2010, when Division 36 officially became the Association for the Psychology of Religion and Spirituality
The Psychology of religion or Psychology of spirituality uses scientific methods to study how beliefs, practices, and experiences influence human thought and behavior.
Religion (religiosity, spirituality) is the object of the study!
A basic goal of the psychology of religion is to understand people within the context of their faith commitments (Hood et al., 2018)
Five views (Johnson, 2009)
Etymology (Latin etymologia, Ancient Greek ἐτυμολογία (etumología), from ἔτυμον (étumon, true sense), literal meaning of a word according to its origin. The study of the origin of words but it also study the way in which their meanings have changed throughout history.)
Psychology is concerned with the study of the mind, with the study of the soul, with the study of the human psyche. This broad definition, however, is far from unproblematic (Francis, 2009).
What is meant by the human mind, the human soul, the human psyche?
What tools are available to study such phenomena as religion (religiosity) and spirituality?
In academic psychology, scholars such as William James and G. Stanley Hall not only helped to found psychology, but manifested a great interest in the psychological study of religion (Hood et al., 2018)
Earned the first doctorate in psychology awarded in the United States of America at Harvard College
Hall was the first president of the American Psychological Association (1892)
Stanley Hall, founding president of Clark University (1889),
Inviting Sigmund Freud and Carl Jung to visit and deliver a lecture series at the Clark Conference (1909).
Established the Clark school of the psychology of religion
In 1917, Hall published a book on religious psychology, Jesus the Christ in the Light of Psychology.
Reinterpreted traditional Christian doctrines into psychological, evolutionary and scientific concepts, emphasizing the experience of the individual over theological dogma. Jesus the Christ, despite approval from psychologists, was inadequate even to the liberal theologians (Vande Kemp, 1992a)
Humanistic point of view without transcedence (Jonte-Pace & Parsons, 2002) and point of view from evolutionary perpective
Whereas Haeckel proposed that the embryonic development of each organism follows the evolutionary history of its species, Hall argued that the postnatal developmental path of the child’s mind and behaviour follows the evolutionary path of the human species as a whole. (Green, 2015)
Regarding Recapitulation theory and racial; have been criticized for providing a pseudo-scientific basis for racism and eugenicist thought.
Reasons are offered for Hall’s relatively swift obscurity as a religious psychologist (Vande Kemp, 1992b)
‘all definitions of religion are more or less arbitrary’ James Pratt
Thus, religion ‘as I now ask you arbitrarily to take it, shall mean for us the feelings, acts, and experiences if individual men in their solitude, so far as they apprehend themselves to stand in relation to whatever thty may consider the divine’ William James
Religion is a felt practical relationship with what is believed in as a superhuman being or beings (Robert Thoules)
A system of spiritual beliefs, practices, or both, typically organized around the worship of an all-powerful deity (or deities) and involving behaviors such as prayer, meditation, and participation in collective rituals.
Other common features of organized religions are the belief that certain moral teachings have divine authority, and the recognition of certain people, places, texts, or objects as holy or sacred. (APA Dictionary of Psychology, n.d.)
religion: both individual and an institutional construct
spirituality: increasingly used to refer to the personal, subjective side of religious experience
religious or religiousness: representing as institutional, formal, outward, doctrinal, authoritarian, inhibiting expression
spirituality: individual, subjective, emotional, inward, freeing expression
polarization or religion and spirituality (institutional/individual domain) ignores the fact that all forms of spiritual expression unfold in a social context and that virtually all organized faith traditions are interested in the ordering of personal affairs
implicit in the evolving definitions is the sense that spirituality is good and religion is bad - very simplistic perspective
most people experience spirituality within an organized religious context
SBNR
Attribution in the psychology of religion and spirituality
Search for the meaning (Why now?, Why me?, Why here?)
Importance of meaning making in context
Core theme for the psychology of religion
an attempt at explanation
various types of reductionism (methodological, theoretical, etymological, ontological)
Examples: Sigmund Freud and William James
Freud The Future of an Illusion
James: religious beliefs are reduced to their pragmatic functional value